1. Title of the Dataset: Feedback Spillover Effect
2. Date of Deposit: 02/07/2019
3. Principal Investigator: Dr Zahra Murad
4. Project: NA
5. Funding: Funded by Leverhulme Trust (Grant RL-2012-681)
6. Data Collected from  6/10/2015-1/12/2016 at the University of Surrey, Guildford.
7. Open Access Sharing
8. Any Restrictions: NA
9. Request for Access: NA
10: Information on outputs: Behavioral Research in Accounting Publication titled "Feedback Spillover Effect on Competitiveness across Unrelated Tasks"

Data OverView: 
11. Data File:  FeedbackSpillover.dta Stata file containing the data, Data_WME_AllSessions.do Stata do file that conducts the analysis
12. The .dta file contains the raw data, and the .do cleans the data and conducts the analysis. 
13. Variables (most labelled in the do file):  
sessionid - which session the subject participated in
subject- the subject identifier
group - which 4 person group subject was in. 
profit - amount earned (without showup fee)
confprob_ct - the confidence reported for the circle task
q_ct - number of circles completed +1
effort_ct - number of correct circles completed
rank_ct - what rank subject achieved for circle task in his group from 1 to 4. 
confprob_nat -  pre-task confidence reported for the  Number adding task
confprob_nat_port - post-task confidence reported for the number adding task
q_nat - number of number adding tasks completed
effort_nat - correct number of number adding tasks completed
rank_nat - what rank subject achieved for number adding task in his group from 1 to 4. 
piece_rate - piece rate for the number adding task
tournament_choice_row_x - choice of tournament (1) or piece rate (0) in row x of the table
selected_row - which row of the table was randomly selected for the payment
prefexp - measure of aversion to social comparison in a self-reported end-of study questionnaire 
female - gender dummy
age 
ethnicity
Study 
risk_taking -self reported willingness to take risks
confidence_general - self reported confidence level
competitive_general - self reported competitiveness 
relatedtasks - whether the subjects thought the tasks were positively related, unrelated or negatively related
incentibelief - whether subjects were in the main study (1) or in the robusness study (0). 
wrongswitch - whether there was non-monotonicity on what subjects chose in the table. 
pr_equivalent - subjects' measure of competitiveness inferred from their table choices
top_ct - whether subjects were top or bottom two of their groups in the circle task
top - the main treatment variable of receiving top feedback (2), bottom feedback (1) or no feedback (0)
14. Methodology is laid out in the .do file
15. Data collection was ethically approved by University of Surrey Ethics Committee 
16. For more info please refer to the paper titled "Feedback Spillover Effect on Competitiveness across Unrelated Tasks"